On July 7, 2010, Gayle Kessleman, Co-Chair of New Jersey Citizens for Immigration Control debated Michael Wildes, the Mayor of Englewood, NJ and an Immigration attorney. The debate was held on channel 9, WOR TV in New York City, NY
On July 7, 2010, Gayle Kessleman, Co-Chair of New Jersey Citizens for Immigration Control debated Michael Wildes, the Mayor of Englewood, NJ and an Immigration attorney. The debate was held on channel 9, WOR TV in New York City, NY
#1 by cameron6136 on 12/02/2011 - 7:57 AM
Immigration should have been inforced my the Indians.
#2 by ahluwaliar on 12/02/2011 - 8:19 AM
We need this law in Paterson NJ, I tired of having to a school (JFK) that is filled with all these mexicans, Dominacains, that have taken over JFK and Paterson. The teachers know this ,but the Mayor and all the white people on top don’t want to do nothing about them. Come to JFK in Paterson and see all the fights, all the gangs, the fact that black, puerto ricans, and white kids can’t walk down the hall ways at Kennedy.
#3 by FedUpinJersey on 12/02/2011 - 9:12 AM
Good job Gayle! Wildes is a clueless idiot and as usual, uses the race card. That’s what they do when they have nothing worthy to say, aside from interrupting when one is speaking the truth. This explains why Wildes is an immigration lawyer….a loser!
#4 by rocky3557 on 12/02/2011 - 9:45 AM
u fucking asshole we need our fucking jobs we americans are losing all our jobs i vote for gayle shes rite about everything this asshole is a piss of shit ill punch him in the face fuck u we need to enforce this law
#5 by zeprulesagain on 12/02/2011 - 10:09 AM
How rude he is.
Gayle said it best in the end, Immigration needs to be enforced, not reformed. This entie debate, all of the press conferences, the announcements, the rally’s, the boycotts and now several lawsuits, all of it could be avoided if the federal government would just do what it’s already supposed tobe doing. To think that if all of the energy used so far would have been used towards securing the border look at how much closer we would be. It’s a long process we need to start now.
#6 by DEDA96 on 12/02/2011 - 10:54 AM
Gayle is awesome!!! Bless You Gayle!!
#7 by redbankrick on 12/02/2011 - 11:26 AM
Nice. I put it on my blog , but can’t seem to post the link here (????????????????) We must shoot down this move to get 10-20 M new dem voters.
#8 by legalatina on 12/02/2011 - 11:55 AM
Good job, Gayle!
#9 by DebbieSue1210 on 12/02/2011 - 12:51 PM
Great job again, Gayle! A++++
#10 by marysedenzer33 on 12/02/2011 - 1:00 PM
Gayle Kessleman is totally right , Michael Wildes support law breakers and ignore the damage that it does to America and Americans
#11 by Tremleypt on 12/02/2011 - 1:14 PM
It is not racist, bigoted or xenophobic to demand that our countrys borders be secured . It is racist, bigoted and xenophobic by illegal aliens, their facilitators and advocates to demand that we allow them free reign with impunity in our country, simply because of who they are. Dont fall for their ploy, exhibit a staunch backbone and tell them we are the most diverse nation on the face of the earth we welcome more LEGAL immigrants that the rest of the entire world combined does every yr
#12 by captkirkconnell on 12/02/2011 - 1:56 PM
Nice woman, stupid man
#13 by goru426 on 12/02/2011 - 2:02 PM
AZ Law is inspired and payed by FAIR, a group well known for its WHITE SUPREMACY roots!
We need to stop the cheap XENOPHOBIC propaganda as soon as possible and pas sensible immigration reform!
HATE and RACISM will not solve our immigration problems, nor they will fix our broken immigration system!
#14 by borderraven on 12/02/2011 - 2:13 PM
Article 4 Section 4
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
Paraphrasing: “Every state in the Union, is responsible to every state in the Union, for securing our Union against INVASION and DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.”
#15 by borderraven on 12/02/2011 - 2:43 PM
Article 1 Section 10 Clause 3
“No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.”
Paraphrasing: “Every state in the union, shall, without the Consent of Congress, engage in War, when actually INVADED.”
#16 by borderraven on 12/02/2011 - 3:18 PM
See
Legal Analysis of Arizona’s S.B. 1070 for the US Congress
fasDOTorg/sgp/crs/homesec/R41221.pdf
See
scribdDOTcom/doc/33483116
Why isn’t Obama suing these sanctuary city immigration policies?
MAP: USA Rule of Law and Sanctuary Cities
bitDOTly/cPYVZk
485 hours away until SB 1070 becomes effective.
Copy to your browser and replace the DOT with a period.