Patent Attorney Katherine White of Enterprise Partners Venture Capital kicks off this new speaker series with advice for inventors on securing successful patents in a talk sponsored by the Von Liebig Center for Entrepreneurism and Technology Advancement at UCSD’s Jacobs School of Engineering. Series: “Von Liebig Forum” [5/2004] [Public Affairs] [Business] [Show ID: 8679]
#1 by bullenchris18 on 11/23/2011 - 8:52 PM
false christ comes first
#2 by srJuliana903 on 11/23/2011 - 9:48 PM
hookup now bit.lyrm8R3i
#3 by rlinventor on 11/23/2011 - 10:36 PM
The America Invents Act changes things: 1) not disclosing best mode will not cause you to risk losing the patent, 2) not correctly indicating the inventors will also not cause you the same risk (in Section 20 of the bill, all language referring to “deceptive intent” has been erased), 3) under First-to-File, your risk of disclosing your invention confidentially greatly increases. The new laws are bad for independent inventors and good for vested interests and those who intend to deceive.
#4 by ThinkStage on 11/23/2011 - 10:54 PM
Very cool
To see more innovative videos like this or want to share your own ideas visit ThinkStageDOTcom
#5 by supplierhq on 11/23/2011 - 11:23 PM
Conclusion:
Patent is only for big companies that afford big legal fee. Even your claim is granted, other companies can steal your idea. If you don’t have millions of $ to sue them, just shut up and watch them making big $, and you get NOTHING.
So, why bother to spend $25k to hire a patent attorney to file your application when patent cannot really protect you?
Do you really think Apple will give you licensing fee if they think your patent is good for their new products?
#6 by qdub11 on 11/23/2011 - 11:40 PM
Thank You Katherine………very well done.
#7 by LawyerVideoMarketing on 11/24/2011 - 12:35 AM
nice video
#8 by PatentUFO on 11/24/2011 - 1:24 AM
Great video!
#9 by StarfishBingo on 11/24/2011 - 2:16 AM
@jerthemessiah
Check it:
w ww.an archa dia.co m
#10 by StarfishBingo on 11/24/2011 - 2:29 AM
@bigchrisrogers
Check it:
w ww.an archa dia.co m
#11 by bigchrisrogers on 11/24/2011 - 2:37 AM
Thankyou
#12 by bernardofarley on 11/24/2011 - 2:53 AM
marriage service from you rockmycity.info
#13 by FlemingAldridge on 11/24/2011 - 3:27 AM
Best place to find women gettop5.info
#14 by jerthemessiah on 11/24/2011 - 3:37 AM
If the government objects to monopoly prices for new inventions, it should stop granting patents.
#15 by serenaadams64 on 11/24/2011 - 3:55 AM
Overweight females in the making love online naneedj.info
#16 by hauusddfd on 11/24/2011 - 3:59 AM
Get a peace to your life with an Latino girl rockmycity.info
#17 by davidhleo on 11/24/2011 - 4:47 AM
21:45 depending claim
#18 by davidhleo on 11/24/2011 - 5:02 AM
14:45 explanation of infrigment
#19 by IamPrasanth9 on 11/24/2011 - 5:22 AM
I have a major Doubt, what if the Attorney leaks my Idea, so some one else will get the patent, just before me, due to the attorney’s cunningness.
I suppose all Patent attorney’s will be having good links with corporate industries and big figures, so he will get a huge ransom, if he leaks some others Idea to these industries..so they will have the patent legally, as if they invented it.
So i suppose, If one has the Idea – one has to do all the work himself totally, finally contact a Attorney
#20 by mojitobanana on 11/24/2011 - 5:59 AM
This woman is amazing! Thank you.
#21 by kristyjoi on 11/24/2011 - 6:41 AM
The Railhead Manufacturing case that you mentioned in which the provisional application does not satisfy 112, is that a typical case or an extraordinary case? How often are patents invalidated based on 112 support in the provisional or is it that the patent invention is no longer novel after relying on the non-provisional filing date rather than the provisional filing date?
#22 by mjribes on 11/24/2011 - 7:25 AM
Very informative! Thank you for posting this.
#23 by 1888junkteam on 11/24/2011 - 8:01 AM
excellent work!
#24 by jcsteuart2 on 11/24/2011 - 8:28 AM
First, great discussion. Really helped me clarify my understanding of how to read a patent / from a drafting perspective.
Question RE: Public Disclosure -
As the internet continues to capture and catalog every comment and thought that we all have, how will the courts determine if the published ramblings of the masses constitute a “publication” of the idea, thereby preventing patenting and inhibiting the incentive for the hard work of bringing the idea(s) to market?
Thank you.
#25 by hitssquad on 11/24/2011 - 9:04 AM
Unused patents can be sold:
whynot. net/ideas/3553
“Part of the reason for so many unused patents is that firms do not realise that their patents may have value to others. The patent itself may be of little use to the firm that invented it (the invention may have been ‘accidental’) and therefore they just sit on it unaware that others might like to use it. Some companies are now realising this and are offering unwanted patents for sale through patent auction websites.”
Problem solved.